|
ДЖАФЕР, Алджан |
|
Abstract: The main body of the Ottoman army was composed of Spahiy, Timariotes andAbstract: The main body of the Ottoman army was composed of Spahiy, Timariotes andJanissaries. The degradation of the classical Ottoman army began at the end of the 16th century. In the 18th century, during the Russian-Turkish war of 1768-1774, the declinewas clearly visible. All reform efforts fail. With the ascension to the throne of Sultan MahmudII (1808 – 1839), the Janissary Corps was liquidated in 1826, after which the new army Asakir-i Mansure-i Muhammediye (Victorious Army of Muhammad) was created. In the first half of the 30’s of 19th century, the authorities decided to create a redif (reserve)army to help the regular army. The two military formations also included men from EskiDzhuma (now Targovishte). Their names, physical characteristics, property status, occupations, combat units, regular, reserve, infantry, cavalry, zaptia, rank, etc. features are founding nufus, temettuat defters and other Ottoman Turkish documents on local city administration from the 1930 s. and 1940s.
Key words: Ottoman army, military, janissaries, Eski Dzhuma, Ottoman-Turkish documents.
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Ayaydın, R. 2011. Military Obligations and Exemptions in the Ottoman State(1826–1914). Master Thesis. T.R. Istanbul University Institute of SocialSciences, Department of Islamic History and Arts. Istanbul 2011. / [Ayaydın, Rıdvan. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Askeri Yükümlülükler ve Muafiyetler(1826–1914) Yüksek Lisans Tezi. T.C. İstanbul Üniversitesi SosyalBilimler Enstitüsü İslam Tarihi ve Sanatlar Anabilimi Dalı. İstanbul2011].
Evren, G. 2017. Social, Recruitment of soldiers to the Asâkir-i Mansûre-iMuhammediyye Army (Hamid sanjak and İsparta example). Sciences Research Journal, Volume 6, Issue 4, 191–213 (December 2017), ISSN:2147–5237, pp. 191–213. / [Evren, Gökçe. Social, Asâkir-i Mansûre-i MuhammediyyeOrdusuna Asker alımı (Hamid sancağı ve İsparta örneği). Sciences Research Journal, Volume 6, Issue 4, 191–213 (December 2017), ISSN: 2147-5237, ss. 191–213].
Chetin, S. & Dogan, A. 2018. The Establishment of the Asâkir-i Mansûre-iMuhammediyye Army and its Reflections on Amasya. Gaziantep UniversityJournal of Social Sciences, 17 (3), 2018, pp. 1174–1185 / [Çetin, Sadık.ve Doğan, Ayhan. Asâkir-i Mansûre-i Muhammediyye Ordusunun Kurulmasıve Amasya’ya Yansımaları. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17 (3), 2018, ss. 1174–1185].
İA 1991. Encyclopedia of Islam. Turkish Religious Foundation. volume 3,1991, p. 458. / [İslâm Ansiklopedisi. Türk Diyanet Vakfı. cilt 3, 1991, ss.458].
İlhan, S. 1991. The Place of the Tanzimat in the Military Structure of the OttomanEmpire. Bulletin 1991, vol. 55, issue 213, pp. 563–578. / [İlhan, Suat. Osmanlıİmparatorluğu Askeri Yapısı İçerisinde Tanzimatın Yeri. Belleten1991, cilt. 55, sayı 213, ss. 563–578].
Kelesh. H. 2006. Asâkir-i Mansûre-i Muhammediyye Kanunnâmesi. KastamonuEducation Journal, March 2006, vol:14, No:1, pp. 227–240. / [Keleş,25 Отбелязани са четирима души да получават заплата, но крайната сума е 250 гроша. Туквероятно заплати получили само хората, които не са с адрес Ески Джума град. Нamza. Asâkir-i Mansûre-i Muhammediyye Kânûnnâmesi. KastamonuEğitim Dergisi, Mart 2006, cilt:14, No:1, ss. 227–240].
Kayapinar, A. & Kayapinar, L. 2019. Kayapanar, Ayshe. and Kayapanar, Levent.Unrest in Northern Bulgaria. Struggle for supremacy between Trastenikogluand Yalkoglu (1800 – 1806). Proceedings of CEHR, Vol. IV, 2019, pp. 275–286. / [Каяпънар, Айше. и Каяпънар, Левент. Размирици в СевернаБългария. Борба за надмощие между Тръстеникоглу и Йълъкоглу(1800 – 1806). Известия на ЦСИИ / Proceedings of CEHR, Vol. IV,2019, с. 275–286].
ОАТК 1986. Ottoman Military Organization and Clothing (1876 –1908), Military Museum and Cultural Site Command. İstanbul 1986. / [OsmanlıAskeri Teşkilât ve Kıyafetleri (1876 – 1908), Askeri Müze ve Kültür SitesiKomutanlığı. İstanbul 1986].

