• +359 886 753023
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Austria as a Bridge for Bulgaria to the West, 1969–1990. A Model of “Peaceful Coexistence” During the Cold War NADIA BOYADJIEVA ANNA GRAF-STEINER PETER RUGGENTHALER

User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active
 

Nadia Boyadjieva, Anna Graf-Steiner  & Peter Ruggenthaler

Article is received: 
Article is published:      
DOI: 
Article language: English
dawnload article as pdf

 

Abstract: The Bulgarian Communist Party decided on January 16, 1968 to intensify economic, trade, cultural, scientific-technical and tourist relations with Austria. The establishment of “special relations” with Austria was given great emphasis in Bulgaria to increase the role played by itself in the Cold War theater, despite the difference in the socio-political order of the countries. After the suppression of the Prague Spring, Soviet leaders explicitly instructed Bulgaria to intensify relations with Western countries to sew discord among them. Vienna, in turn, gratefully accepted the outstretched hand from Sofia in order to intensify and test its Ostpolitik. When Zhivkov made a plea to Austrian Chancellor Klaus to advocate a pan-European security conference and even hold it in Vienna, Vienna, however, remained reluctant, as it did not want to be seen as a mouthpiece for Moscow’s wishes. An intensification of economic relations, on the other hand, were welcomed in Austria, especially to prevent to drive Bulgaria further into Moscow’s arms after the invasion of Czechoslovakia in August 1968. Nonetheless, trade remained imbalanced as there was little demand for Bulgarian products in Austria, despite mutual efforts (1971: agreement on payments; 1972: tourism agreement; 1973: most-favored nation treatment). The close integration of the Bulgarian economy into the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) left tourism as the only concrete field in which economic relations could be expanded.The article further concentrates on humanitarian issues frequently put forward by Austrian officials, as they – not least during the CSCE – ranked high on the Austrian agenda. It were also these issues that from Sofia’s (and, behind it, Moscow’s) perspective dragged out the CSCE negotiations. Of all people, the Austrian Chancellor Kreisky, whose Foreign Ministry and delegation supported these agendas, agreed with this assessment. At the same time, Sofia planned to use the humanitarian cases presented by Austria as political leverage, not least in exchange for cooperation against anti-Bulgarian emigrants in Austria.Todor Zhivkov interpreted the post-Helsinki agenda primarily in the further expansion of economic cooperation – and Austrian officials accepted, that there were limits with regard to cooperation in other, including humanitarian, matters. Cultural cooperation reached its peak in the 1970s and until Lyudmila Zhivkova‘s death in 1981. Todor Zhivkov’s adoption of a strongly nationalistic course in the 1980s strained the friendly relations, but did not bring them to an end. When Vienna hosted the CSCE Follow-up Meeting 1987-1989, it exercised restraint, but continued to stand up for the humanitarian provisions (Basket III). This “pro-Western” stance was seen critically (not only) in Sofia.After the opening of the “Iron Curtain” in 1989, Austria discontinued to focus on Bulgaria, but instead stretched its supportive hand towards those countries in Eastern Europe which showed signs of transformation. But also Bulgaria was more interested in expanding its relations with the USA and the large EU member states. Austria joined the EU in 1995, and Bulgaria followed in 2007. Whereas Austrian neutrality was thus limited to the purely military sphere – Bulgaria, on the other hand, joined NATO in 2004. Integration in Western institutions provided a degree of cooperation, security and stability to the two countries far beyond what had been possible during the Cold War.

Key words: détente, Cold War, Austrian-Bulgarian political and diplomatic relations, neutrality, economic cooperation, CSCE, human rights

 

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to many archivists in Austria and Bulgaria, including the Austrian State Archive /Archive of the Republic (ÖStA/AdR), the Central State Archive of the Republic of Bulgaria (Tsentralen Darzhaven Arhiv na Republika Bulgaria, or CDA), the Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Bulgaria (Arhiv na Ministerstvo na vanshnite raboti na Republika Bulgaria, AMVnR), and the Stiftung Bruno Kreisky Archive (SBKA). 

REFERENCES

Archival Materials and Published Documents

Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy Report 1984. Report of the Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs.  

Archiv na Ministerstvo na vanshnite raboti na Republika Bulgaria (AMVnR) [Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Bulgaria] (Sofia).

Arbeiter-Zeitung, 13th of April 1969.

Tsentralen Darzhaven Archiv na Republika Bulgaria (CDA) [Central State Archive of the Republic of Bulgaria], (Sofia) Fond (F.),1B

State Archive Austrian /Archive of the Republic (ÖStA/AdR). 

Stiftung Bruno Kreisky Archive (SBKA), Vienna (Bruno Kreisky Archives Foundation). 

Conference on Security and Co-Operation in Europe Final Act. (1 August 1975). Helsinki, 1975.

Vanshna politika na Narodna republika Bulgaria. (1979) Ministerstvo na Vanshnite raboti na NRB. Sbornik ot dokumenti i materiali v dva toma. Tom I 1944–1962. (Sofia) [Foreign policy of the Peoples’ Republic of Bulgaria (PRB)]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRB. Documents and materials in two volumes.  Volume I. 1944-1962, Sofia, 1979]

Secondary Sources

Bachmaier (1999) P. Bachmeier, „Brücken über den Eisernen Vorhang“, in: K. Kalew, ed., Tradition und Zukunft. 120 Jahre diplomatische Beziehungen zwischen Bulgarien und Österreich. (Vienna), pp. 94–117. 

Bachmaier (2008) P. Bachmaier “Die Rolle der Kulturpolitik in den Beziehungen zwischen Österreich und Bulgarien 1962–2008,” in: P. Bachmaier, A. Schwarcz & A. Tcholakova (eds.), Österreich und Bulgarien 1878–2008: Geschichte und Gegenwart. (Vienna), рр. 251–270. 

Bachmaier (2009) P. Bachmaier “Austrian–Bulgarian Cultural Relations,” in: A. Suppan & W. Mueller (eds.) Peaceful Coexistence or Iron Curtain? Austria, Neutrality, and Eastern Europe in the Cold War and Détente, 1955–1989.  (Vienna), рр. 487–508.

Békés (2008), C. Békés, “The Warsaw Pact, the German Question and the CSCE Process”, in: O. Bange – G. Niedhart (eds.), Helsinki 1975 and the Transformation of Europe. (New York & Oxford), рр. 113–128.

Bischof & Ruggenthaler (2022) G. Bischof & P. Ruggenthaler Österreich und der Kalte Krieg. Ein Balanceakt zwischen Ost und West. (Graz-Vienna).Borchard et. al. (2020), M. Borchard, H.-J. Küsters, St. Karner, P. Ruggenthaler (eds.), Entspannung im Kalten Krieg. Der Weg zum Moskauer Vertrag und zur KSZE. (Graz & Vienna).

Boyadjieva (2009), N. Boyadjieva “The Impact of the Cold War on the Origins and Evolution of International Human Rights Regimes”, in:  Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe, N3 (VI), (Krakow),  рр. 47–58.

Boyadjieva (2017) N. Boyadjieva, Mezhdunarodni otnosheniya [International Relations]. (Sofia).

Boyadjieva (2021) N. Boyadjieva. The USSR and Yugoslavia’s Policy of Nonalignment, 1955–1980“, in M. Kramer et. al. (eds.), The Soviet Union and Cold War Neutrality and Nonalignment in Europe. The Harvard Cold War Studies Book Series. (Lanham: Lexington Books), pp. 356–375.

Boyadjieva (2023) N. Boyadjieva. “Human Rights, the Helsinki Process, and the Soviet Bloc, 1971–1989“, in Institute for Knowledge, Science and Innovations (eds.), Knowledge, Science, Technologies, Innovations (Conference Proceedings), Volume 4/2023 (Veliko Tarnovo), рр. 462–471.

Boyadjieva (2023A) N. Boyadjieva. “Political Upheavals and Regime Change in Bulgaria, 1985–1989“, in Institute for Knowledge, Science and Innovations (eds.), Knowledge, Science, Technologies, Innovations (Conference Proceedings), Volume 4/2023 (Veliko Tarnovo), рр. 610–619.

Gilde (2013) B. Gilde, Österreich im KSZE-Prozess 1969–1983. Neutraler Vermittler in Humanitärer Mission. (Munich).

Graf-Steiner (2024), A. Graf-Steiner, Brückenbauer im Kalten Krieg. Österreich und der lange Weg zur KSZE-Schlussakte. (Graz – Vienna – Berlin).

Grozev, Baev (2008) Gozev, K.& J. Baev. „Bulgaria, Balkan Diplomacy and the Road to Helsinki“. – In: Oliver Bange and Gottfried Niedhart, eds. Helsinki 1975 and the Transformation of Europe. (New York), рр. 160–174.

Fischer (2009) Th. Fischer, Neutral Power in the CSCE. The N+N States and the Making of the Helsinki Accords 1975. (Baden-Baden).

Haftendorn (2008) H. Haftendorn, “The Link between CSCE and MBFR: two sprouts from one bulb, in: A. Wenger, V. Mastny & Ch. Nuenlist (eds.), Origins of the European Security System. The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–1975. (London & New York), рр. 237–258

Kalinova & Baeva(2006), Ev. Kalinova, I.Baeva,  Bălgarskite prekhodi 1939–2005 (Sofia)

Kramer, Makko & Ruggenthaler (2021) M. Kramer, A. Makko & P. Ruggenthaler (eds.), The Soviet Union and Cold War Neutrality and Nonalignment in Europe. (New York & London). 

Kramer (2021) Kramer, M. „The USSR and Cold War Neutrality and Nonalignment in Europe.“ – In: Kramer, Makko & Ruggenthaler (2021) M. Kramer, A. Makko & P. Ruggenthaler (eds.), The Soviet Union and Cold War Neutrality and Nonalignment in Europe. (New York & London). pp. 533–564.

Liedermann (2002) H. Liedermann „Österreichs Rolle beim Zustandekommen der KSZE”, in: O. Rathkolb, O. M. Maschke & St. A. Lütgenau (eds.), Mit anderen Augen gesehen: internationale Perzeptionen Österreichs 1955-1990. (Vienna), рр. 487–505.

Makko (2017) A. Makko, Ambassadors of Realpolitik. Sweden, the CSCE, and the Cold War. (New York).

Mateeva (2005). M. Mateeva. Istorija na diplomaticheskite otnoshenija na Bulgaria (Sofia).Morgan (2018) M. C. Morgan, The Final Act. The Helsinki Accords and the Transformation of the Cold War. (Oxford).

Renk (1996) H. Renk, Der Weg der Schweiz nach Helsinki: der Beitrag der schweizerischen Diplomatie zum Zustandekommen der Konferenz über Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa (KSZE), 1972–1975. (Bern).

Rentola (2005) K. Rentola, „Der Vorschlag einer europäischen Sicherheitskonferenz und die stille Krise zwischen Finnland und der Sowjetunion 1968–1971”, in: D. Geppert & U. Wengst (eds.), Neutralität – Chance oder Chimäre? Konzepte des Dritten Weges für Deutschland und die Welt 1945–1990. (Munich), рр. 177–202.

Rosin (2013) ,  Ph. Rosin, Die Schweiz im KSZE-Prozeß 1972–1983. Einfluß durch Neutralität. (Munich).

Schramm, Riggert, Friedel (1972), F.-K. Schramm, W.-G. Riggert & A. Friedel (eds.), Sicherheitskonferenz in Europa, Dokumentation 1954–1972 (Metzner, Frankfurt).

Zagorsky (2005), A. Zagorsky, Chel’sinkskiy Process. Peregovory v ramkach Soveščanija po bezopasnosti i sotrudničestvu v Evrope 1972–1991. (Moscow).

Zhivkov (2006), T. Zhivkov, Memoari (Sofia).